Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 1301 - 1320
of 18,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2024, 7:36 am
Louisiana.At the end of the day, then, we're left puzzling over why various Justices voted as they did. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:14 am
Supreme Court Morrison Sports Ltd & Ors v Scottish Power [2010] UKSC 37 (28 July 2010) Star Energy Weald Basin Ltd & Anor v Bocardo SA [2010] UKSC 35 (28 July 2010) O’ Brien v Ministry of Justice [2010] UKSC 34 (28 July 2010) ZO (Somalia) & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 36 (28 July 2010) Rollins, R v [2010] UKSC 39 (28 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)… [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 11:30 am
Especially when you're at a white shoe firm like Skadden Arps.So when Justice Willhite wrote last month that counsel for defendants -- Joren Bass, Richard Zuromski, and Raoul Kennedy -- repeatedly "misled" the Court of Appeal, including at oral argument, by stating a certain fact that wasn't true, you can understand why these attorneys might have been more than a little bit bummed. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
[Note: This post has been updated and re-posted.] [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
Mr Justice Gillen’s judgment in the case of Lee, Morrison and X v News Group Newspapers ([2010] NIQB 106) has now been made public. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:12 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) King, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 376 (27 March 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC B1 (QB) (26 March 2012) Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd (t/a Medirest) v Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust [2012] EWHC 781 (QB) (28 March 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) SMP Trustees Ltd, Re [2012] EWHC 772 (Ch) (27 March 2012) High Court… [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 12:19 pm
At a practical level, what does the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Keays v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
Justice Gomes thinks it does; or, at least, that it requires a mental examination. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:31 am
JUSTICE BREYER: You’re right, Justice Ginsburg, that the court of appeals for the Federal Circuit thought it was bringing this statute up to date and it even said so. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 4:26 am
In response, Josie twitted: “you’re making things mutually exclusive that aren’t. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:05 am
The Supreme Court’s November sitting might be finished, but we’re still going. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 6:14 am
” And then, it’s round two of partisan gerrymandering in Benisek v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 4:40 pm
Justice Ehrcke in Thierman Estate v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
You can learn more about this from Justice Corrigan's opinion, but the easiest hypo is when you're trying to kill X and X is standing in a tight group of 10 people and you blast your Uzi into the group, killing not only X (who you wanted to kill) but also Y and Z. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 8:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:55 pm
Three year ago, I was in the Court for arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:20 am
Huawei and ZTE v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
The argument in Danforth v. [read post]
