Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 4."
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
What if they're political? [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Mantello, No. 05-0731 Judgment denying a petition for habeas relief is affirmed where the trial court did not unreasonably apply clearly established Supreme Court precedent in rejecting defendant's claim that his exclusion from the courtroom during a pre-trial conference violated his constitutional rights U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, April 09, 2008 US v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Rodriguez, No. 07-10535 Defendant's sentence for illegal reentry following removal is affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court committed Fanfan error by sentencing him within a framework that limited its ability to vary from the Guidelines; 2) the district court erred in treating a prior drug conviction as a drug-trafficking offense under U.S.S.G. section 2L1.2; 3) the sentence was unreasonable; and 4) the sentence violated his equal protection rights because he did not have… [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
SC04-1251 "The petition for review in the case at hand is granted, the decision under review is quashed, and the matter is remanded to the First District Court for reconsideration upon application of the Florida Supreme Court's decision in State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Branker, No. 07-8 Denial of habeas petition challenging convictions for the murder of a state trooper and a deputy sheriff is affirmed where: 1) the Supreme Court of North Carolina did not unreasonably apply the clearly established federal law of Batson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
App. 4 Cir.1999), rehearing denied, writ denied 769 So.2d 4; Ibieta v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Of course, whether reliance and causation are elements of a UCL claim is an unresolved question that the Supreme Court is expected to address in In re Tobacco and Pfizer. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:07 pm
They're everywhere. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Sabol, No. 06-2692 Grant of petitions for habeas corpus is reversed where the Bureau of Prisons rule denying placement in a community corrections center to all prisoners during the first ninety percent of their sentences was a reasonable exercise of the BOP's discretion in carrying out its duties under 18 U.S.C. section 3621(b). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:00 am
Candidate Species are those petitioned species that are actively being considered for listing as endangered or threatened under the ESA, as well as those species for which NMFS or FWShas initiated an ESA status review that it has announced in the Federal Register. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
The U.S. patent office has issued initial rejections in the re-examination proceedings of all NTP patents in question. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:04 am
Affirmed.NFP civil opinions today (4): In Re: The Estate of Patrick J. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 11:56 pm
The day before the continued foreclosure sale was to take place, the debtor filed its bankruptcy petition. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Thompson, No. 07-1014 "Denial of a petition for federal habeas relief is affirmed over petitioner's arguments that: 1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his state trial for murder; 2) the revised 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d)(1) violates Article III, the separation of powers, and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Shaaban, No. 06-2801 After a conviction for offenses related to defendant's attempt to sell the names of CIA agents working covertly in Iraq to the Iraqi Intelligence Service, defendant's motion to recall the court's mandate is granted where defendant's counsel failed to adequately explain why, despite his initial view that a petition for rehearing would be appropriate, the actual disposition on appeal foreclosed the arguments that he had intended to raise in… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Peters, No. 05-6101 "A sentence imposed on remand for offenses arising out of a tax fraud scheme is reversed and remanded for re-sentencing where the district court's failure to address defendant's "time-served" argument did not satisfy the "procedural reasonableness" requirement required by Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 5:23 am
In re Zimmerman, No. 06-15151, 2008 WL 161423 (11th Cir. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 5:45 am
The judge initially denied her request (asserting that it seemed to him she was changing it for fraudulent reasons - the only grounds the law allowed him to deny her request). [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
Ex parte Arthur, 711 So. 2d 1097 (Ala. 1997) Arthur's application for re-hearing was denied 1998. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:47 pm
The Court has re-read the trial testimony of Dr. [read post]
