Search for: "In re PHILLIPS"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 2:58 am
In fact, the military had begun second-guessing a decade's worth of tests conducted by its one-time star lab analyst, Phillip Mills. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
Supreme Court The main issue for the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Collins, Clarke and Dyson) to decide was whether the First and Second Complaints were based on the same grounds, such that the general principle that the same cause should not be brought against somebody twice (nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa) was engaged. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:03 pm
MEMORANDUM EYES ONLY To: The Partners From: Dr Erasmus Strangelove, Director of Education, Strategy and Psyops RE: Retention of staff and human capital maximisation Gentlemen, 1. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:48 am
(And they had help from Michael Powers and Sean McPhee of Phillips Lytle and Terrance Flynn of Harris Beach.) [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
(Lord Walker [193]) and Lord Phillips expressed his concerns as to the consequences of this “absolutism” if a minister&r [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:20 pm
That was Bradley Phillips. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:05 am
Phillips of Los Angeles, countered that “thinking twice is not a severe burden,” the Chief Justice retorted: “Well, if you’re thinking twice and one way you’re thinking is not to do it, that sounds like a sufficient burden. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm
See In re Caulk, 125 N.H. 226, 232, 480 A. 2d 93, 97 (1984); State ex rel. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
As stated in Phillips v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:51 pm
Greg Anderson made the slow walk up to the front of Courtroom 10 in the Phillip Burton Federal Building Tuesday, standing before U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
So, they're most likely public domain. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
By Beth Hanson, with George Lenard In Part I last week, we introduced and explained the Supreme Court’s February 28 “cat’s paw” ruling in favor of the plaintiff in Staub v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
posted by KATIE PHILLIPS Last Saturday, the College Board served up a mega-curveball for high school students across America: it asked them to write an essay about reality television. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:11 am
Convergence -- they're all in it together! [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:19 am
“There is no doubt that those derogations can only be made where they’re strictly necessary. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
What’s Happening in Washington Dan Jaffe, Executive Vice President, Government Relations, ANA It’s within our power to affect how present challenges are resolved. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
An example of the sort of thing we're talking about can be seen on this site which the IPKat received from his friend Sophie Lachowsky (Arnold & Porter) only this morning. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:22 pm
In October last year, Megan Phillips, a solicitor at Bhatt Murphy, was awarded £17,500 in damages plus £28,000 in costs by Mr Justice Eady for defamation by Solicitors from Hell. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
Cir. 2006) (en banc) Phillips v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:11 am
MEMORANDUM From: Matt Muttley, managing partner To: Partners and fee earners RE: MOST IMPORTANT – FEES – ENGAGEMENT LETTERS TO CLIENTS 1. [read post]
