Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 1301 - 1320 of 5,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
” Slip op. at 10 (emphasis in original).[10] In discerning the scope of a public official’s authority communicate on particular matters, the Court turned to section 1983, identifying “statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage” as the “potential sources of such power. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm by Alexander Berengaut and Tarek Austin
While no court has yet ruled on the issue, several commentators (and the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Here's a 1-day course which comes with a 10% discount for IPKat readers | Here's a new edition of Retromark ... to catch up with all the (cool) trade mark news! [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:11 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
  [1] Pandemic Business Dispute Resolution Service, http://ciarb.org/disputes/pandemic-business-dispute-resolution/ [2]Ibid [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:02 pm by Robert Chesney
This amendment would place an undue burden on the Executive branch, which already reports extensively to Congress on U.S. operations in Afghanistan. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:06 am
The ruling of the High Court was appealed and the Court of Appeal ruling came on the 13March 2018.Lord Justice Lewison considered the steps followed by the High Court in ruling on the preliminary injunction (see paragraph 10 of the High Court judgement): "Following the sequence set out by Lord Hoffmann, I must consider the following matters in deciding whether to grant an interim injunction. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In the present case, subject-matter of the originally filed claims 2, 3 and 4, can therefore be re-introduced into claim 1, as long as it does not infringe A 123(2) and (3). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 11:17 am by Hull & Hull LLP
    I guess the Rules aren’t new necessarily but there are a number of substantial amendments to the Rules and perhaps we can spend some time talking about those and just pointing out some of the highlights or important features with respect to the amendments. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Code § 10-301[a], the section that regulates pistols and revolvers. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 10:30 pm by Alexandra Molitorisová
If a new regulation were to be adopted today, it would take an additional 10 to 15 years for the first real applications to appear on the market, e.g. in food products. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
§ 355-1.[10]  Such flexible interpretation would have been far more faithful to Congress’ evident intent, requiring that pharmaceuticals be made reasonably available to a covered entities’ patients at discounted prices. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
"First and foremost," CAAF ruled, "Appellant's [original] plea was improvident as a matter of law, which had the effect of canceling the pretrial agreement according to its terms. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Shortly after T 1402/13, R.51(2) was amended (per 1/1/2017) for clarification by addition of a last sentence "The legal consequence laid down in Article 86, paragraph 1, shall ensue upon expiry of the six-month period. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:52 am
The SI provides a new subsection, s. 77(10), which states that s. 77(1) does not apply to unitary patents. [read post]