Search for: "In v. United States"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 102,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 3:32 am
Friend, the United States Supreme Court addressed the confusion among state courts regarding the appropriate standard to establish a corporate or company defendant's place of business in a diversity case. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:58 am
Michael Kent Curtis (Wake Forest University - School of Law) has posted Citizens United and Davis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
After all, the Supremacy Clause makes the Constitution, treaties and laws of the United States supreme over state law, and while an agency regulation can plausibly be described as a "law" of the United States, it is hard to see how the exercise of prosecutorial discretion is a kind of federal "law" that preempts state law. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:12 am
In the recent landmark United States Supreme Court confrontation clause decisions, Justice Stevens voted with the majority in both Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 9:46 am
United States [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm
United States [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:15 am
A Statistical Profile of Mexican Adults Repatriated from the United States (Migration Policy Institute, May 2017) [text]"Sub-Saharan African Immigrants in the United States," Migration Information Source, 3 May 2017 [text]A Syrian Immigrant’s Experience in 1930s America (Refugees Deeply, May 2017) [text]Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (2 May 2017)Tagged Publications. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
For example, the decision states that a district court does not have the power to suspend a sentence, citing United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:14 am
Regina (A) v Secretary of State for Health Court of Appeal “A failed asylum seeker was not ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom so as to be entitled to free treatment by the National Health Service. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:34 am
Hussain (Zakir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Evasion of immigration controls for a long time was not in itself a reason for deciding that an applicant, unlawfully in the United Kingdom, should not be allowed to stay. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:59 am
Odelola v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 25; [2009] WLR (D) 162 “The version of the immigration rules which was applicable to the determination of an application for leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom was the one in force at the time the application came to be determined rather [...] [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
R (Abdullah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] WLR (D) 185 “Directions for the removal of a person who had no right to remain in the United Kingdom following the dismissal of his claim for asylum were not suspended by virtue of s 78 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 and [...] [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Proclaimed by the President of the United States on July 26, 1911. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:56 pm
The United States Supreme Court's decision in Navarette v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:21 am
The Supreme Court of the United States is nearing the end of its October, 2012, term, and the opinions are coming at a very high pace. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:55 pm
United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 5:22 am
The case is Hunt v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:02 am
United States Supreme Court? [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court cases of this term, Citizens United v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:11 am
Justices Souter and Ginsburg dissented, insisting that the statute is unconstitutional under the Court's precedents, New York v. [read post]
