Search for: "Kennedy v State" Results 1301 - 1320 of 7,329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Observations on the Oral Argument in Bond
5 Nov 2013, 11:23 pm by Marty Lederman
Texas and Missouri v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Learning From Bedrosian, Cavanaugh, and Town of Greece v. Galloway
7 May 2014, 11:39 am by Paul Horwitz
  What does Justice Kennedy's opinion in Town of Greece v. [read post]
PrawfsBlawg - http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/
A pro-abortion rights spokesman cries out against a Supreme Court decision that's like a planted seed, growing and eventually "popping out."
30 Dec 2010, 5:19 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
There's new state-level legislation banning abortion after the 20th week, premised on the notion of fetal pain and building on the legal precedent in Gonzales v. [read post]
Althouse - http://althouse.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] S. Ct. Will Decide: May States Require Age Verification to Access Porn Sites?
2 Jul 2024, 7:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Will Decide: May States Require Age Verification to Access Porn Sites? [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Transcript & Coverage of Maples v. Thomas
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm by Steve Hall
The oral argument transcript in Maples v. [read post]
StandDown Texas Project - http://standdown.typepad.com/weblog/
Oral Argument Preview: Abortion Clinic, State Spar Over Standing Requirements for Single-Subject Challenge. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Governor John R. Kasich et al.
19 Sep 2017, 5:58 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Kennedy Intermediate Sch., 61 AD3d 911, 912; Navarra v Lynbrook Pub. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Kennedy Intermediate Sch., 61 AD3d 911, 912; Navarra v Lynbrook Pub. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Symposium: Once more, with substance – How the Supreme Court should approach Fisher II
9 Sep 2015, 12:20 pm by Richard Sander
  At Breyer’s urging, Kennedy took a different tack; instead of rolling back the scope of preferences permitted by Grutter v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Flyspecking Denedo
20 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
See Kennedy v. [read post]
CAAFlog - http://caaflog.blogspot.com/
Tribute: Formidable teacher, friend and still “somewhat of an enigma”
28 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Sionaidh Douglas-Scott
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
A statement made by a person unavailable as a witness because of death is excluded from the hearsay rule in a civil proceeding if the statement was made in good faith upon declarant’s personal knowledge in circumstances indicating it is trustworthy
26 May 2011, 3:20 am by PaulKostro
” State v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
“Fidelity to principles of federalism is not for the States alone to vindicate”
16 Jun 2011, 10:45 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Supreme Court handed down a unanimous opinion in Bond v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
Of Course If We Took the Constitution Seriously, We'd Never Execute Anyone. Then Where Would We Be?
8 Oct 2013, 10:25 pm by Jeff Gamso
  In 2008, the Supreme Court said in Kennedy v. [read post]
Gamso - For the Defense - http://gamso-forthedefense.blogspot.com/
Supreme Court Agrees: California’s Prisons are Overcrowded
23 May 2011, 3:42 pm by Michael McKneely
(Read the high court’s opinion in Brown v. [read post]
Criminal Law Blog - http://www.mikeonyourside.com/blog
Preliminary Objections Regarding Venue and Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens Addressed by Superior Court
5 Sep 2024, 6:02 am
In the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
Tort Talk - http://www.torttalk.com/
Vartelas v. Holder and the retroactive application of the 1996 immigration amendments
23 Jan 2012, 2:33 pm by Kevin Johnson
In INS v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
The Department of Justice's Override of the Alabama Supreme Court
10 Mar 2008, 10:07 am
The case, Riley v. [read post]
Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com
Cert in Connecticut v. AEP: Eight Comments
6 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  And if you take the position the key vote is Kennedy’s, then it doesn’t matter: if he votes to affirm then it’s 4-4 and it’s upheld, and if he votes to reverse it wouldn’t matter where Sotomayor was. 8)  But I don’t think Kennedy will be a key vote on this case. [read post]
Legal Planet - http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Recognizes Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by David S. Kemp
Justice Kennedy also authored the majority opinion in the seminal 2003 case Lawrence v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/