Search for: "Lee v. LEE"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 7,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2006, 11:50 am
The IPKat is thankful to Lee Curtis for tipping him off about Louis Vuitton v Haute Diggity Dog, decided by the US District Court for the Eastern Circuit of Virginia and possibly the first case to be decided under the Dilution Revision Act 2006 (readers, if you know of any earlier cases, please drop the IPKat a line).The case noted by Businesswire, but the IPKat has had sight of the full transcript.HDD sells parody plush toys and beds for dogs, under names such as Jimmy Chew,… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:20 am
Facts: This case (Arthur Lee Dickerson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:24 pm
” The case cite is Derek and Constance Lee Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:54 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Mathena v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:38 pm
Lee, No. 2013-1628 (Fed. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
My concerns with Kelly v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:18 pm
We ended the semester by spending a couple of days discussing the religion in schools cases including Lee v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:47 am
Descarga y lee Betterman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:23 am
In Lee v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
Or, policyholders would avoid CGL insurance altogether in favor of intellectual property (IP) insurance, which usually covers the cost of sitting on either side of the “v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:12 pm
Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
In my last unreasonably long post, I discussed the case of Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:41 am
Descargue Barr v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:04 am
The convictions are now overturned.The case is Kelly v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:31 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 10:14 am
Cadleway Properties v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:55 pm
AIP Acquisition LLC v. iBasis, Inc., C.A. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:59 am
See State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 6:11 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:59 am
A win for class action objector Ted Frank as Seventh Circuit allows him to challenge what he described as “objector blackmail” payments to other intervenors [Amanda Bronstad, National Law Journal, Pearson v. [read post]
