Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 1301 - 1320 of 4,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand down panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Mance. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Giles Peaker
Not only was it concerned with the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977, rather than the provisions of the Housing Act 1996, the determination of the House of Lords in R v LB of Harrow ex p. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:12 am by Charlene Richer
On examining the authorities relied upon in the Court of Appeal (R v Ngyuen [2008] EWCA Crim 585 and R v O’Dowd [2009] EWCA Crim 905), the Court did not consider that there was any clear definitive statement on the issue now raised. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Home Office v Essop & Ors; Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 14-15 November 2016. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am by Dave
 His argument was that there is a line of authority, of which Earl of Pomfret v Lord Windsor (1752) 2 Ves Sen 472 (28 ER 302) provides an example, in which a beneficiary goes into occupation as a tenant at will; a beneficiary who goes into occupation as a tenant at will and pays rent on a periodic basis becomes a periodic tenant. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm by Giles Peaker
The court was persuaded In Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No. 2) [2004] 1 AC 816, Lord Hope stated at paragraph 106:- “… Article I of the First Protocol has a similar character [to Article 6(1)]. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm by familoo
There are good things in this book, but much of it we have heard before – although I did not know until now that the infamous response letter in the matter of Arkell v Pressdram did not put off the claimant, and that litigation ensued anyway (albeit unsuccessful). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am by ASAD KHAN
This judgment triggered some further recriminations despite the fact that Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge unanimously dismissed Mirza, Iqbal and Ehsan’s appeals. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:46 am by INFORRM
In an early holiday delivery, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) today handed down its judgment in the joined cases of Tele Sverige/Watson & Ors (C-203/15/C-698/15), this morning. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
  The authority cited in support of this proposition is Pozzoli SPA v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, in which Jacob LJ stated at para 10: "I would add this about permission to appeal in patent cases generally. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
The majority, in a judgment given by Lord Toulson (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption and Hughes agreeing), upheld the claimant’s appeal in Carmichael and dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal in Rutherford – both relating to disabled claimants with a medical need for an additional bedroom. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 1:00 am by Sarah McKeeve, Brodies LLP
Factual background The appellant, Mr Charles McCann has been detained as a patient of the State Hospital, Carstairs since the mid-1990s. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:53 am by INFORRM
 The Court held that, in principle, the right to respect for private life under Article 8 can extend to the professional lives of the social worker and police officer (R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health and R (L) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]