Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Litigation Blog) New Jersey local patent rules (IP Frontline) US Patents – Decisions CAFC applies KSR – finding combination claims obvious: Ball Aerosol v Limited Brands, Bath & Body Works etc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) CAFC rejects lower court’s ob [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:14 pm
… On February 13, 2018, Doe filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Regents in Los Angeles Superior Court, in which he challenged the disciplinary proceedings and decision rendered by the University. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Gelblum, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, California; Carey R. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
I’m assuming he meant the FDIC, but what do I know, that’s what the court documents said, the FTC. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
BC347671) APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Federal court papers on a settlement between the government and the Indiana-based company say that Cummins shipped heavy duty diesel engines to vehicle equipment manufacturers between 1998 and 2006 without including pollution control equipment. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:24 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles, which adopted a new “ABC test” to determine whether a worker is properly classified as an independent contractor. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
ALM: LegalTech West Coast June 23-24, 2010 Los Angeles, CA Click here for more information. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
Superior Court (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 830 cited in those decisions, this is the first published California case holding that CEQA’s 10-day service provision operates as a statute of limitations, which competes with and trumps the 90-day service statute of limitations of Government Code § 65009(c)(1). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Unlike the Brookings report, the list that follows is not based principally on court documents. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
LEXIS 26 (Appeals Board noteworthy panel decision), confirms that despite the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Zurich American Ins. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:57 am
An example of a successful settlement agreement occurred in Los Angeles about a decade ago, and has been an exemplar [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
Unsurprisingly, the Los Angeles Superior Court dismissed her pseudonymous case against me, and ordered that she be depseudonymized, though she is currently appealing those decisions. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
County of Los Angeles (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1112, 1126.) [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
California – California Lawmakers Send Governor New Gift Rules after Scandals Los Angeles Times – Patrick McGreevy | Published: 8/29/2014 California lawmakers gave final approval to a bill that reduces to $200 from $440 the value of gifts officials can receive from a single source each year. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
Filed in November by an attorney seeking more than $107,000 in fees, the suit was never entered into public records after a Los Angeles Superior Court judge said she "inadvertently" sealed the entire file. [read post]
