Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 70,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2023, 2:00 pm
Whereas it is possible for the trade mark holder to put the trade mark to genuine use in the context of second hand sales, the simple reference to the contested trade mark on second hand vehicles would not amount to genuine use pursuant to Article 58(1)(a) EUTMR.Furthermore, express consent by the trade mark holder, or the intention of third parties to act on behalf of the holder was not demonstrated by Ferrari in the present case. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 6:36 am
First, that case concerned the applicability of EU trade mark legal instruments to an online platform established outside the territory of the EU, rather than the determination of jurisdiction in such cases. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
In this episode of SCOTUScast, Mark Behrens, a partner at the DC based law firm, Shook Hardy & Bacon, offers his own analysis of the case. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:35 pm
In this case, the ridicule appears to be well deserved. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:15 am
At the heart of the case, and of the amicus brief we helped file for INTA this week, is whether free speech concerns should trump the statutory bar on registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” marks. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:22 am
Here, as the current game of European trade mark reform approaches the endgame, it seems that a simple, single solution that will apply equally to Community trade marks and national marks may still be allowed to evade our grip -- and this will certainly happen if we ignore it. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 12:30 am
In the case of the bejewelled eagle head, the application was for virtual goods in Class 9 and physical jewellery in Class 14. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:00 pm
Mark R. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
Mark and I have been on many programs together over the years. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:52 am
Republished by Blog Post PromoterLas Vegas Trademark Attorney reports that the Second Circuit has taken the “advice” of the New York Court of Appeals and rendered a final decision in the BUKHARA “famous marks doctrine” case. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
This Kat will wholly admit his lack of nuanced knowledge in this area and the specifics of the above case, inviting any readers willing to educate him more on these provisions in the comments.Nevertheless, this case only serves to highlight the importance of trade mark registration in China, and the possible effective provenance of any reputation therein. [read post]
Case Preview: Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (Case ID: 2021/0201).
21 Feb 2023, 7:35 am
In this post, Rachel Free (Partner), Toby Sears (Partner) and Omri Shirion (Associate) of the CMS Intellectual Property team, preview the UK Supreme Court’s upcoming hearing of Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 4:26 am
In the case of Robert Lee Stinson, "two forensic odontologists testified that Stinson's teeth were a match [with bite marks on the homicide victim's body], even though Stinson was apparently missing a tooth in a place where the bite marks indicated a tooth. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
The plaintiffs did not seek to invalidate the defendant’s trade mark because, according to Spanish Supreme Court case law, the time limit for doing so action had already expired. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:17 am
Va. appeals court declines to re-hear transgender bathroom access case on Tuesday that involves a Virginia transgender student, marking a victory for the student and advocates of transgender rights. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:07 am
P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but dismissed the false patent marking case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to sufficiently plead intent to deceive. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:57 am
This case represents a counterpoint to the Pizzaiolo case. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:57 am
This case represents a counterpoint to the Pizzaiolo case. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 1:39 am
Use in variant formIn this case, the Court went through each of the following five signs and compared them against the Easylife Stylised Mark as registered: In respect of the figurative marks depicted at Signs 1, 2 and 3, the Court held that the dominant element of both the registered mark and those signs was the word "easylife", which was used in the signs identically, from an aural perspective, and similarly from a visual perspective. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:40 am
Nestle meanwhile runs its own weightloss programme, Jenny Craig Inc.This looks to the IPKat like a rather unconventional interoperability case. [read post]
