Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
Valeo and Citizens United. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 2:56 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 6:07 am
Monday, January 27, marks the three-year anniversary of President Trump’s executive order on Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States, commonly referred to as the “Muslim ban. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Evans’s understanding of equality in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 6:33 pm
Backer, Race, "The Race," and the Republic: Re-conceiving Judicial Authority After Bush v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:43 pm
King, where the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling that will have major implications on searches and seizures. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:58 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted that motion, holding that plaintiffs had not alleged falsity or materiality. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 3:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 6:44 am
Monday, October 3 marks the start of the United States Supreme Court's October Term. [read post]
1 May 2017, 9:15 am
Levin WHEN: Wednesday, May 3 9:30 am WHERE: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit John Joseph Moakley U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:01 am
" Here's what we'll be discussing: This CLE is a panel discussion of the recent United States Supreme Court opinion Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
From across the border, Canadians have been watching the fallout from recent decisions from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
United States, the Court will consider whether four key provisions of S.B. 1070, Arizona’s immigration law, are preempted by federal law. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
Opposer provided no evidence of market share in the United States, and its evidence of media attention was not probative regarding reputation of the mark in this country. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
It explained that The conspiracy statute under which the jury convicted Leitner criminalizes conspiracies to either: (1) commit any offense against the United States; or (2) defraud the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
