Search for: "Murphy v. State"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2017, 6:39 am
– Murphy v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:39 am
– Murphy v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:06 pm
United States, which interpreted the Fourth Amendment to impose certain limits on the warrantless collection of the historical cell phone location records of a criminal suspect; (3) Murphy v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
Cases that may be of interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:22 am
Monday’s opinion in Town of Greece v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:29 am
First National State Bank of New Jersey, 432 A.2d 890 (N.J. 1981); Pascale v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:38 am
At her Court Beat blog, Joan Biskupic discusses Snyder v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:15 pm
Murphy Oil USA, et al., 585 F.3d 855 (5th Cir. 2009). [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:38 am
” At Courthouse News Service, Barbara Leonard looks at Murphy v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:03 am
” At FiveThirtyEight, Ty Schalter looks at the practical consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Murphy v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:41 am
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Although Willis, acting for Fulton County and the state of Georgia, has no power to grant Powell or Chesebro any kind of immunity against federal prosecution, pursuant to the SCOTUS decisions in Murphy v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:00 am
” At his eponymous blog, Michael Dorf suggests that Justice Clarence Thomas “deserves some credit for calling attention to the Court’s failure to fully justify or consistently approach severability issues” in Murphy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:02 am
Just this week, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
