Search for: "POWELL v. STATE"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,604
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2011, 10:48 pm
Justice Lewis Powell wrote for a 5-4 majority in McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Proximate cause of damage to oil rig was an insured peril (waves), not inherent vice: “inherent vice” in insurance cases should be narrowly construed to exclude anything caused by external accidents Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am
State Department provided a detailed rebuttal in 2017. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
In People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
In 1984, United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
He is a frequent commentator on constitutional issues and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Andy Biggs and state Rep.Mark Finchem. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 9:31 pm
When contacted by CNN about Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:31 pm
(During OT97, SOC issued State Oil v. [read post]
Northern Ireland District Judge acquits Pastor of “gross offence” against Muslims – Rosalind English
17 Feb 2016, 4:40 pm
Pastor McConnell gave evidence as to his background and stated he became a Christian at the age of 8 and had been a full time preacher for 60 years. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
This second appeal–United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:08 am
Justice Lewis Powell wrote. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am
New York and 335-7 LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
See Mazzola v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:21 am
The case, Sackett v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:25 am
Kennedy was actually the third choice to succeed Powell. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am
The court holds that they acted in bad faith and for an improper purpose—and not (as Powell claimed at the hearing) seeking to change the law like Thurgood Marshall did in Brown v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]
