Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am
As Lord Hope said of Miss Campbell (paragraph 120 of Campbell v MGN Ltd), “… it is not enough to deprive Miss Campbell of her right to privacy that she is a celebrity and that her private life is newsworthy. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:24 am
However, the Scottish court found that such an interference was justified as compensating people who develop pleural plaques was a legitimate aim. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm
However, there are also obvious disadvantages – it seems likely that more people would be encouraged to make complaints. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
However, there are also obvious disadvantages – it seems likely that more people would be encouraged to make complaints. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:20 am
That would have been the end of the matter, but for the House of Lords, which decided in the combined case of A v Hoare to reverse its own decision in Stubbings (1COR’s Lizanne Gumbel QC was for most of the appellants although not Mr Hoare). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
Odone is referring to Johns & Anor, R (on the application of) v Derby City Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 375 (Admin). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am
” And as Lord Bingham went on to note in R (on the application of Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary, the essence of breach of the peace in Howell “was to be found in violence or threatened violence”. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
In this vein it cited Lord Mance, who said in Laporte v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary [2007] 2 AC 105: The requirement of imminence is relatively clear-cut and appropriately identifies the common law power (or duty) of any citizen including the police to take preventive action as a power of last resort catering for situations about to descend into violence. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The Judge quoted Lord Brightman in Ex p. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The Judge quoted Lord Brightman in Ex p. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:57 am
In Radmacher v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
The Court of Appeal today gave judgment in the case of ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:06 am
There are many people however who believe the scheme is not going far enough to protect children. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:03 am
Scarlet v SABAM The SABAM is the Belgian equivalent of PRS, a royalty collecting agency representing music artists. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:11 am
".Naturally there are omissions. 'Nerd' fails to gain an entry, notwithstanding the consideration of this word by Lords Justices Jacob and Pill in the patent appeal of Rockwater v Technip (here). [read post]
