Search for: "People v Person"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 31,537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2020, 6:40 pm
In Legacy Church, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 2:07 pm
Jay Spiegel & Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:31 am
Information to the police that shots may have been fired was sufficient to justify a stop when another person said he "thought" that the people were in a particular van. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:15 am
People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 8:31 pm
In People v Bonilla-Machado, No. 140510, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed three issues on appeal, reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals in part, and remanded for resentencing. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:38 pm
The recent case of Hughes v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:46 am
On January 20, 2009, I drafted an entry on People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am
Its interpretations might be subject to cultural background, personal experience and the values they hold. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:07 am
AND I CAN TELL YOU JUST SITTING HERE OVER THE LAST HALF HOUR WATCHING PEOPLE EVEN BEFORE WE GET TO COMMUTE HOURS COMING DOWN 16TH STREET, ONE PERSON ALMOST DIDN’T EVEN SLOW DOWN UNTIL GETTING RIGHT UP TO THAT POLICE CAR BEHIND ME. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Loving v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
The Court is expected to release its long awaited opinions in Brown v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:16 am
https://www.financialinstitutionslegalsnapshot.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2024/09/Lowe-v-Certain-Underwriters-at-Lloyds-of-London-Subscribing-to-Policy-Number-ATCSI00100-2024-FCA-858.pdf Lowe v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London Subscribing to Policy Number ATCSI00100 [2024] FCA 858 – BarNet Jade – BarNet Jade [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
We therefore substitute our own discretion, " even in the absence of an abuse [of discretion],' " and we modify the order by determining that defendant is a level two risk (People v Smith, 30 AD3d 1070, 1071, quoting Matter of Von Bulow, 63 NY2d 221, 224; see People v Brewer, 63 AD3d 1604). [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:16 pm
†Copyright © 2009 This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. [read post]
9 May 2010, 4:26 pm
Factually, People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 4:24 pm
Still, some people exercise their 4th Amendment right not to “consent” to a warrantless blood draw. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:38 pm
Wright v. [read post]
