Search for: "People v. David"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 5,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
David Finnerty U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:28 pm
Neoliberalism v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
That assumption has been undermined by Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
Briefly: For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports on a pending cert petition, Kisela v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:08 am
Last year, in District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 1:26 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 5:30 am
You can read Parts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII.] [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
’ Dutcher told investigators that he used his slingshot to hunt small animals, and (actually comparing himself to David) that he could kill a man with it. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 6:15 am
David A. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
That idea was turned on its head in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:40 pm
A significant DNA case is pending before the California Supreme Court as well as the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, both of which have said they will wait to hear how the Supreme Court decides the matter before issuing their opinions.Read: “Supreme Court to hear fight over taking DNA from arrested people,” by David Savage, published at LATimes.com. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
"Henslee v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:56 am
Under the terms of the proposed settlement in Padro v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:16 am
In this case, a federal court quashed non-party subpoenas served on community activists in connection with a developer's civil rights lawsuit against an upstate New York community.The case is Bloomingburg Jewish Center v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In the 2014 Noel Canning v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:15 pm
New York Supreme Court Justice Thomas Marcelle ruled Monday in the case Cuomo v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
On 23 March 2017 Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
” In The New Republic, David H. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:32 pm
” The judge struck out the defence of truth, accepting the claimant’s argument that saying that the law firm was a “scam solicitor” was an allegation of dishonesty – and therefore, following the decision of Sir David Eady in Wasserman v Freilich ([2016] EWHC 312 (QB)), was a factual allegation. [read post]
