Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 17,547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2018, 9:28 am
It is, many people would argue, correctly, beside the point if, say, a majority in a given jurisdiction wish to continue discriminating on grounds of race, gender, sexual orientation, etc. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 5:21 pm
Read Yolanda Young v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:01 pm
As a result of the robbery, three people were killed and two were severely wounded but survived. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:54 am
How will Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:54 pm
See Teter v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:36 am
By Eric Goldman Career Agents Network, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
In People v Hawkins (2008 NY Slip Op 09254 [11/25/08]) the Court of Appeals provided counsel with further guidance as to what is required to preserve errors for review as a matter of law. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:10 pm
Grutter v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
In the case of Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37, the Supreme Court has reviewed the Children Act 1989, s 20 and given guidance in relation to its application. s 20 is an incredibly far-reaching statutory provision and is used in the context of local authorities providing services to unaccompanied minors, disabled children, abandoned children as well as children who are on the edge of care proceedings. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
In Miranda v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:36 am
I refer to a classic contract law case, Odorizzi v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:28 am
Given the CCPA’s newness, it’s disingenuous to adversely interpret the lack of precedent. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 10:05 pm
C, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2008] EWHC 1230 (Admin) is, in the end, mainly concerned with education, but there is quite a bit of interest to housing people. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 4:50 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am
The Court noted the fact that the text of s.24 § 7 of the 1881 Act distinguishes between statements which directly encourage people to commit certain offences and those which encourage discrimination [43]. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:27 pm
Eurodif and United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Given the potentially far-reaching consequences of Gonzalez v. [read post]
