Search for: "People v. Hering (1999)" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
In 1999, President Clinton nominated Kagan for a judgeship on the D.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
Cir. 1999), and Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Playing that out here, it may just be standard for defendants who are protected even by a harm rule to remind courts/courts to remind readers of the reasons for that rule--§230 couldn’t be more explicit that it sacrifices the interests of some people who are indeed harmed to the greater service of protecting “the internet,” and courts and defendants nonetheless remind us all the time of the good purposes Congress had. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:04 pm by Mandelman
These rates moved from near 2 percent in the mid-1990s to more than 3 percent by 1999. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:26 pm
Collectively, they make a compelling case for change.In Shaw v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:46 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here's a bit of a lengthy excerpt providing some of that little-discussed history:The criminal justice system's reliance on databases is both old and new. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
" This was a two-page document that was entitled "confidential personal financial statement" for "Alan/Elaine Margulis," dated February 1, 1999. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
" This was a two-page document that was entitled "confidential personal financial statement" for "Alan/Elaine Margulis," dated February 1, 1999. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:01 pm by Daithí
According to CNET at least two class actions have already been filed in the Californian courts, including one (Thomson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:17 am
Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Elio Fiorucci went all the way up to the Grand Chamber of theCourt of Justice of the European Union, which gave judgment this morning. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Norwood Realty, Inc., the letter of intent contained language that was explicitly binding.[46] The court held the letter of intent fell into the first category: Here, the intent of the parties to be bound by the letter of intent is not left to inference from the terms of their agreement but is twice expressly stated in prominent parts of the letter of intent. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Here is John’s guest post. ************************************ Worked on, or invested in, an ICO and worried that your ICO may be targeted by the SEC? [read post]