Search for: "People v. Li" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:34 pm by Stewart Baker
One thing that AI is creepily good at is faking people's voices. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:13 am by Steven M. Gursten
As an auto insurance lawyer, I saw the insurance industry make these promises in 1995, when then Governor Engler passed radical tort “reform,” and again in 2004 with Kreiner v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:24 am by Giorgio Buono
Forum Fabrizio Marongiu Buonaiuti, Lis Alibi Pendens and Related Actions in Civil and Commercial Matters Within the European Judicial Area; Caroline Kleiner, Money in Private International Law: What Are the Problems? [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am by Anita Davies
Hearing arguments on the Stolen Valor Act, the justices discussed wartime bravery, high school diplomas and lies people tell on dates. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:19 am by SHG
After all, if Trump nominates him, he must be the anti-Christ who will reverse Roe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, the First Amendment probably limits prosecutions for alleged lies about history or science (at least outside commercial advertising, and absent defamation of a specific living person). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:18 am by Moria Miller
 “It is important for people to have faith in government, but the seed of our mistrust lies in corruption,” he said. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
After long proceedings at national level, a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on 16 December 2008 (Case C-73/07), and after the Court of Human Rights Chamber judgment of 21 July 2015, the Grand Chamber on 27 June 2017 finally found no violation of the right to freedom of expression and information in Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. [read post]