Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2010, 10:03 am
In fact, the Supreme Court held, in Mills v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
Unlike the defendants in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Supreme Court case of Brady v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
First, pollsters use much smaller samples on a regular basis. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
What about hash tag campaigns or other marketing initiatives that rely on people posting content to their own accounts, though? [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 4:09 pm
" In the highly publicized case of State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:55 pm
It is exposure to ideas, and not to their particular expression, that is vital if self-governing people are to make informed decisions. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:04 pm
The state argues that the "grossly repugnant" video games are not worthy of First Amendment protection because they do not communicate or express ideas or information.For more information, please see: Entertainment Software Association et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 7:18 pm
""Put another way, a prosecutor errs when he 'presents statistical evidence to suggest that the (DNA) evidence indicates the likelihood of the defendant's guilt rather than the odds of the evidence having been found in a randomly selected sample," the court said. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 11:37 am
However, that all changed as a result of the ruling in the Supreme Court’s 1972 case Morrissey v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 7:04 pm
Patrick Carrabre's Paganini v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:35 pm
v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
What about hash tag campaigns or other marketing initiatives that rely on people posting content to their own accounts, though? [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 5:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:23 am
In the notorious PLIVA v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:37 pm
One problem: the summary did not list that another, un-charged male's DNA was located in the samples tested. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:55 pm
(People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:20 am
See FTC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:56 am
In 2004, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:42 am
Susan V. [read post]
