Search for: "Perry v. State"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
The Keynote speech [pdf] by Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, John Whittingdale MP. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm
Perry, docket 12-144). [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 2:43 pm
Missouri State of Missouri, et al., v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:23 am
Perry Ellis Menswear, brought by an unpaid intern seeking wages, and Vasquez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
-Ala. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Louis, Missouri): United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
Perhaps courts can't base (or, at least, publicly admit that their basing their decisions) exclusively on "possible effects," but, going back to Marbury and foreword to the embarrassing decision a couple of years ago finding a lack of standing in Perry v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 3:30 am
So, when I was provided a case of Fulgham v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:12 am
Perry, Bonezzi Switzer Polito & Hupp Co. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) (friend's apartment); United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:02 am
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:38 am
This is the question presented in Perry v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 12:19 pm
(quoting Perry Homes v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 pm
06/30/09 SF Chronicle:In his 06/30/09 order in Perry et al v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 1:00 pm
Perry, the Supreme Court rejected an Establishment Clause challenge to a 10 Commandments monument situated on the grounds of the Texas state capitol. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 pm
LUV organizers seek to lobby the state legislature to approve a "marriage protection amendment" that would give voters opportunity to overturn Varnum v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:01 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Eric Mott v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:44 am
Lest we forget, traditional rational basis review was the standard applied in Plessy v. [read post]
