Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 1301 - 1320 of 9,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
But bound up in that inquiry are a great many issues beyond the question of appellate intervention on which we granted certiorari, among them  standing; mootness; vacatur under United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 10:10 am by Steven Cohen
Estes Express Lines et al – United States District Court – Western District of Texas – November 22, 2022) involves a personal injury claim. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:22 am
Stanford student John Dalton discusses last week’s oral argument in No. 08-5274, Dean v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am by Marissa Miller
Baby Girl, United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am by Katherine McCoy
Pietras On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:02 am by Will Baude
I realize that to most people it's not even the fifth-most-interesting case decided this week, but I was particularly surprised and pleased to see Chief Justice Roberts's concurrence on Monday in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 7:12 am
Today’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:01 pm
Via Scotusblog: The United States Supreme Court issued opinions today. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
United States that non-systematic negligence by police officers fall within the scope of the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Courtney Minick
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
The United States Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Christopher v. [read post]