Search for: "Roman v. Roman"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
E v English Province of Our Lady of Charity and another [2012] EWCA Civ 938; [2012] WLR (D) 204 “In a case in which a Roman Catholic parish priest was said to have abused a young girl, and the question arose, as to potential vicarious liability, whether he was an employee, independent contractor, or in some other manner to be considered akin to an employee, the law as to vicarious liability was to be extended such that the question should be approached in a broader way, and… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am
JGE v The Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938 Court of Appeal held (by 2-1 majority) that the High Court was right to find that a Bishop can be vicariously liable for the sexual abuse committed by a priest within that Bishop’s diocese (despite a lack of an actual employer-employee relationship, as is usually necessary for vicarious liability) Hussain, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1952… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:46 pm
Technologies v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:21 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Nicholson v R. [2012] EWCA Crim 1568 (12 July 2012) Suleman v R. [2012] EWCA Crim 1569 (12 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) JGE v The Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938 (12 July 2012) Preece v Edwards [2012] EWCA Civ 902 (12 July 2012) Crossland v University of Glamorgan [2012] EWCA Civ 937 (12 July 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Park Promotion Ltd (t/a… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Tiberius Capital, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Tiberius Capital, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
To name a few: personal responsibility v. governmental intervention; notions of negligence, duty of care, and the reasonable person; foreseeability; national security (the budding argument); material or conspiratorial assistance; and if you want to delve into morality, the argument against such assistance based on natural law (a la righteousness) -- (for example, see Romans 1:18-32). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
The new American spectacle reminiscent of the Roman coliseum. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
"Friends, Romans, Coumtrymen,lend me your ears ... [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Alice v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:10 am
(October 16 is the date on which the Court has set the Masterson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:01 am
See, e.g, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:41 am
An especially important factor is who controls the manner, details, and ultimate result of the employee's work.Case: Digirolomo v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:40 am
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }p { margin: 14pt 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; } Practice point: The court denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to extend their time to file a notice of claim against New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, as the application was made beyond the time limit for the… [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
So, enjoy Hatfield v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:17 am
I had the truly extraordinary experience during the last 6 weeks of working through the Federalist Papers, one by one, for the class I was teaching at Temple's Rome campus (on The Roman Republic and the Constitution). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:07 pm
” Citing Palmer v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:55 pm
Power In Doe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:15 am
Gore and Citizens United v. [read post]
