Search for: "Russell v. United States" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Christa Culver
Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.Docket: 10-778Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the lower court’s dismissal at the pleading stage, based on the evidentiary state secrets privilege, of a suit seeking compensation for the petitioners' unlawful abduction, arbitrary detention, and torture.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for the United States Brief in opposition for respondent Jeppesen… [read post]
7 May 2011, 6:00 am by Gregory Dell
Disability Blog & Cases: UNUM sued by Ohio disability attorney for failure to pay disabiity insurance benefits to ex-nurse restricted to using a cane or motorized scooter to get around Karen Russell has filed a lawsuit against her previous employer and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America in an attempt to collect her long term disability benefits in the United States District Court of the Southern District of Ohio Western Division. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:19 am by Viking
RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:16 am by WSLL
Appellant argues that collection of a sales tax on these vehicle transactions also violates the Commerce Clause, Art. 1, § 8, of the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am by Amanda Rice
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:05 am by Nabiha Syed
United States; JURIST has coverage of both cases, while the Conglomerate offers a round-table on questions raised by Erica P. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by James Bickford
”   Elsewhere in the Post, Barnes also has coverage of the government’s recent cert. petition in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:13 am by Amanda Rice
Texas and heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am by Ronald Mann
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term:  former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]