Search for: "SAID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,880
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2016, 12:48 pm by Amy Howe
Roman Martinez, an assistant to the solicitor general who argued on behalf of the United States, emphasized that parents will choose the fastest option to get relief for their children, which will generally be state administrative proceedings rather than lawsuits in federal court. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by Daniel J. Sargent
But he proceeds from a particular vantage, that of the United States of America. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm by Sandy Levinson
 With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 5:37 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Says her judgment would result in “amnesty for everybody” and “her judgment is so bad that she should never be President of the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:17 am by Ben
From 2013 to 2015 alone, there has been a 50% increase in unauthorized stream-ripping in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:49 pm by Howard Friedman
Nichols & John Witte, Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State (National Report for United States of America), (Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State: Legal Pluralism from a Comparative Perspective, Ed. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:16 am by Trey Childress
Bank of America, 549 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1976), Mannington Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
In The Intercept, Lee Fang takes issue with Justice Anthony Kennedy’s recent refusal to respond to Fang’s request for a comment on Kennedy’s majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:11 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, for example, his opinion for the Court decided whether the search was legal (no) and left it to the lower court to decide whether exclusion was required under existing law. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]