Search for: "SEC v. Downe" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 10:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed in a May 9, 2011 CFO.com article entitled “SEC Cracking Down on Foreign Shell Cos. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Gupta was apparently notified of the planned action by the SEC (most likely through a Wells notice) yet did not step down from the boards of a number of public companies where he had positions. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
  It's All There in Black and White: The illustration at the outset of this post of course depicts the characters from the classic Spy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
Stat. secs. 201.430-440, which restrict bawdy house advertising. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:35 pm
Accordingly, the players had shown at least the requisite "fair chance" of success on their claim that the lockout constituted a violation of Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act.The April 25 decision in Brady v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:35 am by David Post
(David Post) As I’ve noted before on a number of occasions, a possible landmark copyright case is now before the 2d Circuit, Viacom et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 1:58 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
-based social media platform for allegedly sharing members' personal data and Internet browsing histories with aggregators without the members' approval.The 33-page complaint in Virtue v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
The defense experts used moreover were arguably incompetent (inventing non-existent psychological conditions, making simple math errors in calculations, and even mislabeling an upside-down diagram of the brain). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am by James Bickford
Thompson and last week’s oral argument in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:05 am by David Post
(David Post) For those of you interested in this sort of thing or this issue, I’ve written (along with Annemarie Bridy at U Idaho) a “Law Professors’ Amicus Brief” in the appeal (before the 2d Circuit in NYC) in the Viacom et al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:21 pm by My name
School Dist. v Moody’s, 175 F3d 848.), or by investors who suffered losses after their highly rated securities failed (Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. 651 F. [read post]