Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
The technology was developed at Stanford and utilizes so-called machine learning (the same field of computing research that used to be known as artificial intelligence) to provide methods of discovering relevant information and relating it to a legal question. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  As soon as she did, I used it and learned that in 1919 the Court granted Charles Evans Hughes's request that each side receive two hours to argue Commercial Cable Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:45 am
In the United States, unlike in Germany, placing articles in top-tier journals constitutes a necessary step on the long and winding road to tenure. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Ben
Michela Giorcelli and Petra Moser, Stanford University economists, studied Italian opera from the late 1700s through 1900 and found that after Napoleon invaded Italy — bringing with him French copyright laws — those copyright laws were associated with both more and higher-quality operas. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:18 am
Supreme Court decision given in Jun 2014 in the case of Alice v CLS, which arguably makes it more difficult to obtain business method patents. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:06 am
Maldonado, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Tuesday, August 21, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Disclosure, Diversity, Engagement, Institutional Investors, Shareholder voting Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm by Kingsley Egbuonu
 The Court of Appeal in the case of Arewa Textiles Plc & Others v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The US State Department is to collect via applicants’ social media information for tracking and security purposes – the Social Media Law Bulletin has coverage. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
This issue was discussed by Justice Breyer in his Stanford v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Finally, the Court will weigh a petition from the state of South Carolina — Stewart v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:14 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US: CAFC debates whether claim term ‘animal’ includes humans: Martek Biosciences Corp v Nutrinova, Inc (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog)   General USPTO-Pfizer workshop on IP & innovation in Mumbai (Intellectual Property Watch) Australia: Full Federal Court unanimously… [read post]