Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 41,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2008, 2:04 pm
Yesterday SCOTUS decided MEDELLIN v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
Finally, Part V summarizes the implications of the Trump v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
Halkbank relies on Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:52 am
The court may(1) impose a sentence up to the maximum term allowed and, by stating no contrary ruling, implicitly direct that the entire sentence be executed; (2) suspend the imposition or execution of sentence and place the defendant on probation on the conditions that the court considers proper. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
If we read the cases that build this new commercial speech doctrine, cases like Virginia Pharmacy and IMS v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:57 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:17 am
. - Law) has posted Putting Missouri v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:03 am
The Supreme Court will conclude its oral arguments for the current Term with the major case on a state’s power to pass laws to control undocumented immigrants living in the state — Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:08 pm
The Court thus cited to its precedent in Edmond v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
This term, the sleeper case is Department of State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 5:00 pm
In that case, the Court held that the exaction of payment of poll taxes before registration as an aid to collection was a use of the State’s power consistent with the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
Board of Trade, 06-1265), on the power of states to tax the interest on other states' municipal bonds (Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 5:31 am
As described below, we conclude the people retained the power to annul a concurrence by the Governor and the voters exercised this retained power at the 2014 election by impliedly revoking the concurrence for the Madera site. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 8:59 am
Google * Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:15 am
Department for Education v Molyneux: [2012] EWCA Civ 193; [2012] WLR (D) 50 “Regulations E33(2A) and E33(3) of the Teachers’ Pensions Regulations 1997, as amended, did not impose an obligation on the Secretary of State, when considering an application by a teacher for an early pension due to ill-health, made pursuant to regulation E4(4), to request further information from the teacher where the submitted medical evidence did not disclose the… [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
Here is the abstract: In Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
