Search for: "Self v. Self" Results 1301 - 1320 of 21,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 6:40 am by INFORRM
Mark Thomson has accused the media of self-interest in their reporting of the mis-named “super-injunctions ” scandal. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
The '293 patent, entitled "Method and Device for Automatic Visual Perception," claims improved visual perception processors and a method employing a "self-adapting" histogram calculation. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:37 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The Washington Legal Foundation (WLF), a self-styled "non-profit public interest law and policy center that regularly appears before federal and state courts to promote economic liberty, free enterprise, and a limited and accountable government," filed an amicus curiae brief on September 8th, urging the Federal Circuit to rehear en banc Eli Lilly's appeal of the Court's affirmance of an invalidity finding of U.S. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:11 pm by Patent Docs
According to the Appellant's argument, the pay, bonus, and supervisory structure of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board raised at least the appearance that APJs could be improperly motivated in their own self-interest to institute CBMs and other post-grant review proceedings (see "Appellant Raises Due Process Issues in New Vision Gaming and Development... [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:22 pm by Patrick Bracher
[The case is Public Servants Association on behalf of OI Ubogu v Head of Department of Health of Health, Gauteng and Others] [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division rejected Employer's argument that either Workers' Compensation Law §25(4)(a) or §30(2) gave Employer the right to a credit, reimbursement and, or, reduction of workers' compensation benefits it had paid to Claimant.Citing Matter of Harzinski v Village of Endicott, 126 AD2d at 58, the Appellate Division opined that the benefit payments the Employer made to Claimant pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-a(2) do not constitute wages within… [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division rejected Employer's argument that either Workers' Compensation Law §25(4)(a) or §30(2) gave Employer the right to a credit, reimbursement and, or, reduction of workers' compensation benefits it had paid to Claimant.Citing Matter of Harzinski v Village of Endicott, 126 AD2d at 58, the Appellate Division opined that the benefit payments the Employer made to Claimant pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-a(2) do not constitute wages within… [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 12:19 pm by Erica Goldberg
On the one hand, there is no better test of a free speech enthusiast's commitment to principle than a case where a self-proclaimed "journalist" harasses bloggers by creating websites to ruin their Internet footprints. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 12:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Bromford Housing Association Ltd v Nightingale (2020) EWHC 2648 (QB) An application for relief from sanctions by the defendant to file a late witness statement by a homeless officer in a possession claim was rightly refused by the first instance judge as the matters adressed in the statement were self-evident. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 9:27 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Notes and CommentsYurika Ishii, Immunity Ratione Materiae of the Marines as Vessel Protection Detachments: A Case Note on the M/V Enrica Lexie Case Prabhash Ranjan & Praharsh Gour, The TRIPS Waiver Decision at the World Trade Organization: Too Little Too Late! [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 2:05 pm
Connect with the Panel - show respect for the judges.Also, speaking of self-defense, see yesterday's Eslinger v. [read post]