Search for: "Senior Care Inc" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2024, 12:59 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
And “f]or senior executives, existing non-competes can remain in force. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
” Now, you might be thinking… oh, big deal, who cares? [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:02 am
(Editor's Note: This post is based on a Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP memorandum by Amy Goodman and Gillian McPhee.) [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:49 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Attorneys should remember their audience; the arbitrator does not need or want courtroom dramatics-- don't "hype" your case.Be careful not to argue points that are clearly not supported by the evidence; sum up your case as succinctly as possible,Jim Gibbons:I welcome closing arguments in arbitrations, but counsel need to remember that the panel is not composed of lay people. [read post]
The HR manager and the other women met with the owner of the company, who said he wished they had informed him of the situation earlier and assured them that he would take care of it. [read post]
The HR manager and the other women met with the owner of the company, who said he wished they had informed him of the situation earlier and assured them that he would take care of it. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:01 am
“Screwing up” Overstock.com: 8-K: “On April 25, 2006 the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Overstock.com, Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
In explaining the statute’s omission of officers, the court cited to the legislative committee’s comments to the statute, which seems to acknowledge that officers were intentionally excluded from the statute for the following reason:   Although a non-director officer may have a duty of care similar to that of a director, his ability to rely on factual information, reports or statements may, depending upon the circumstances of the particular case, be more limited than in the… [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:42 pm by Adam Levitin
That means that if the Trump Organization, Inc., were to file for bankruptcy, Donald Trump personally would still face liability for the full amount of the judgment. [read post]
Editor’s Note: John Olson is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Washington, D.C. office and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Megan Russo
” The law, however, will not make any exception for transgender athletes who have have undergone hormone replacement therapy or received gender-affirming care. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Scalise (R-LA) that prohibits the use of federal funds to pay the salaries and expenses of the following "czars," or special presidential advisers who are not required to go through the Senate confirmation process: Obama Care Czar, Climate Change Czar, Global Warming Czar, Green Jobs Czar, Car Czar, Guantanamo Bay Closure Czar, Pay Czar and Fairness Doctrine Czar. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:01 pm by Cathy Siegner
At that plant, the people really cared about what they were doing. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by Lyle Denniston
  That part of the new Affordable Care Act challenge can now go forward unimpeded by a procedural obstacle. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:15 am by Chris Castle
ECO has never seemed to care that providers who are very heavily involved in piracy, including Cloudflare, are members of the association. [read post]