Search for: "Shaw v. Shaw" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Kat friend John Shaw reports on the latest trade mark dispute between Chanel and Catherine Sidonio. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Grant V. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:44 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
 Elizabeth Loftus, "The Reality of Repressed Memories"Gary Shaw, Marquette Law Review, 1991, "The Admissibility of Hypnotically Enhanced Testimony in Criminal Trials" [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In Part III, the article explains Supremacy Clause doctrine and distinguishes the Supreme Court’s opinion in Goldstein v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:04 am
Kat friend (and tennis aficionado) John Shaw offers his views on the most notable IP issues that arose during the 2018 tennis season. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm by Reference Staff
*Strict ScrutinyStrict Scrutiny is part of the Crooked Media podcast family and is hosted by three constitutional law professors, Leah Litman (U. of Michigan Law School), Kate Shaw (Yeshiva University Benjamin N. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Jan. 13 conference; apparently held after the Jan. 20 conference) Shaw v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
., impasse over distributions or the hiring or firing of key personnel, but I’ve seen no attempt to fashion an overall framework for evaluating claims of deadlock, that is, until last month’s opinion in Koshy v Sachdev (read here) in which the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in its first-ever effort to construe that state’s deadlock-dissolution statute, devised a four-factor test to determine whether a “true deadlock” exists. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 4:57 pm
Justice Shaw upon which he could found his conclusion that the conduct complained of was reprehensible and was deserving of rebuke. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Co., 669 F.2d 345, 346 (5th Cir.1982) (holding that accumulated leave time is part of total wages and payable in addition to maintenance); Shaw v. [read post]