Search for: "Springs v. United States" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,984
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 10:55 am by kira
In one of the last rulings of the spring term, the United States Supreme Court has given new hope to children who are convicted of capital crimes. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:32 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
HSI seizes the dinosaur bones.Today's court conference in the matter of United States of America v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy  -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by David J. DePaolo
Sierra Chemical defended its action on the basis that Vicente Salas had originally obtained his job by using a false Social Security number to establish his eligibility to work in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:15 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
Nevertheless, as exemplified by the United States and Canadian Supreme Court cases, Diamond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:15 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
Nevertheless, as exemplified by the United States and Canadian Supreme Court cases, Diamond v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:27 am by Ken Shigley
First, it has long been the law in most of the United States that baseball spectators assume the risk of being hit by stray balls. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:50 am by Carolina Bracken
“[V]ery serious violent offences” can outweigh an Art 8 claim “even if they were committed by a minor”. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:06 am by Mark J. Rose, Esq.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:51 am by Leland E. Beck
  Judge Wilkins, of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, threw out litigation alleging the “public trust” doctrine as a predicate to mandating federal rulemaking to restrict greenhouse gases in Alec L. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit said that “rather than looking to the identity of the parties, the type of security at issue, or whether each individual defendant engaged in conduct within the United States, we hold that a securities transaction is domestic when the parties incur irrevocable liability to carry out the transaction within the United States or when title is passed with the United States. [read post]