Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2010, 11:31 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 6/21/10Cite: Allison v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:28 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of AlabamaOpinion Date: 10/6/10Cite: Sylvan Learning, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:23 pm
" In other words, if you had to register in Alabama as a consequence of some crime you committed there, you won't be able to escape those registration requirements simply by moving to a different state, where the same underlying conduct would have been perfectly legal. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Petitioners’ reply   United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:54 am
Instead, he recommended allowing the Judicial Conference of the United States to do its job, studying the issue and recommending any necessary changes through the ordinary process for amending the civil rules. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:08 am by Gerard Magliocca
 When African-Americans in Alabama sued claiming that their constitutional rights were being violated, the Court rejected their challenge in Giles v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-7314, the only case among the group in which the respondent had not yet filed a brief. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
Circuit, in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:16 am by Renee Newman Knake
The Ninth Circuit has compellingly articulated a more appropriate test in United States District Court v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
The compliance manual states that if a charging party dies and there are no indications of class violations, “the legal unit should determine whether a cause of action under state law survives the party and who inherits the rights and interests arising out of the charge. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 10:16 am
The reaction from the court above her, the United States Court of Federal Claims, was direct: the materials "culled from the Internet do not — at least on their face — meet" standards of reliability. [read post]