Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2017, 3:29 pm
That case, Rapanos v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
CALIFORNIA CASES In Vela v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 7:37 am
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
The decision is reported as United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am
California and United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
Especially when the matter is relatively unimportant (at least in the scheme of things) and it's more critical to have a solid, articulated rule than it is for that rule to be precisely right.Right or wrong, until the United States Supreme Court speaks, or until Congress amends the statute, the rule in California is now clear. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
So begins the Conclusion of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, Central Division in the case of Méndez v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm
PSKS, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 vote to overrule the long-lived rule in Dr. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
United States Bureau of Reclamation. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
On appeal, defendants argue that the State of California cannot regulate defendants’ sale of cigarettes to non-Indians because defendants are operating stores located on trust lands held by the United States for the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (the Band), a federally-recognized tribe. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:12 pm
United States, 98 Fed. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:44 pm
The Fifth Circuit Upholds an Overbroad Cell Phone Search In United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
HamiltonCase number: 12-cv-0445 (United States District Court for the Southern District of California)Case filed: February 21, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 28, 2013 4/15/2013 7/15/2013 2013-34 SEC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:31 pm
The California Court of Appeal noted that it “must follow the California Supreme Court, unless the United States Supreme Court has decided the same question differently. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 8:14 am
").SB 260 will also violate the "Dormant Commerce Clause" of the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:06 am
On June 19, 2017, the United States Supreme Court limited the ability of plaintiffs to pursue nationwide class actions in state court. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:13 pm
United States (Indian Health Service; Contract Support Costs) Yurok Tribe v. [read post]
