Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 1301 - 1320 of 13,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2014, 8:51 pm by Jane Chong
California, 134 S.Ct. 2473 (2014), as Riley is controlling and Smith v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm by Terry Lenamon / Reba Kennedy
 This week, the New York  Times wrote a short article informing its readers of the case that is going before the United States Supreme Court out of California, Martel v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:19 am by The Complex Litigator
United States District Court Judge William Alsup (Northern District of California) denied a motion by defendant P.F.Chang's China Bistro, Inc. to transfer a putative wage & hour class action to the Central District of California. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
 District Court for the Northern District of California held, in Center for Environmental Health, et. al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Jillian Friess
However, one ongoing case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California may be trending in the opposite direction. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 8:59 am by Elly Page
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm by Bill Raftery
We have been taught since grade school (hopefully) that there are “three branches of government” in the United States: the legislative, executive, and judicial. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:13 pm by Christopher Bird
In a recent interview with California Lawyer magazine, United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia made what has become a somewhat controversial statement about gender discrimination and the United States Constitution:You do not need the Constitution to reflect the wishes of the current society. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:28 am by Gregg Fisch
  It explained that SB 1818 was enacted in response to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. [read post]