Search for: "State v Bell" Results 1301 - 1320 of 3,335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court determines that the County of Nassau is not responsible for the cost of publication herein, as that is the sole responsibility of the State in that Section 1 of Article XVII of the State Constitution provides that this is a state charge as the same has not been delegated to the County, wherein the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed the lower court's holding that the City was responsible for the cost of publication and instead placed the… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
 Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/5FwuTQfV7i -> US states vow to fight Google after the FTC meekly rolls over http://t.co/05SSbWyR2F -> Bell ordered to change pricing for mobile TV app while it appeals CRTC ruling http://t.co/rPvs7SBl11 -> Guest editorial: Counterfeiting in the 21st century http://t.co/KA56vgF2Oh -> The hackers have gotten in. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by David DePaolo
”Last year the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board issued a significant panel decision, Patterson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
US states are considering tightening regulations. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
Michigan v Duke, Michigan State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
 Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:08 am by SHG
Yet, collaboration gave us the Supreme Court’s opinion in Buck v. [read post]