Search for: "State v. Austin"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,922
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
Yesterday, DataGuidance and Sidley Austin LLP hosted a live Q&A wilth Giovanni Buttarelli, the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), to discuss the state of play following the European Court of Justice's decision in Schrems v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
See Board of Trustees of State University of N.Y. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 6:44 am
A 2015, United States District Court, Austin Division, case is a good place to start for grasping the requirements. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 10:01 pm
The doctrine stems from United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm
Over at The Diplomat, Greg Austin considers which of the South China Sea islands provides the greatest military value. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
The style of the case is, Bige, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
Hall decision allowing a state to be sued in another state’s courts (review limited to questions 2 and 3 in petition) Tuesday, December 8: Harris v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:30 am
The eight grants: THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:42 am
(Even dorm rooms are protected here; see, State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 7:40 am
Nevertheless, the issuance of the recent Fisher v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
United States, in which it is considering whether a conspiracy to commit extortion requires the conspirators to agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, and the arbitration case DIRECTV v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
In the House of Lords, the Chagos Islands case (R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] UKHL 61) because of the historical constitutional and international legal interest and its continuing ramifications which one follows both internationally and actually domestically. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 11:10 am
In November 2009, NYU Press published Professor Ogletree’s book, co-edited with Professor Austin Sarat, The Road to Abolition: The Future of Capital Punishment in the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 5:14 am
The style of the opinion is, Karen Kuester v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 3:03 pm
In Morford v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
University of Texas at Austin affirmative action case, and in the Shelby County v. [read post]
