Search for: "State v. Board of Education"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 5,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 10:12 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:08 am
Into this state of affairs comes a case, Hensley v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:20 pm
Board of Education was correctly decided. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:12 pm
Stanley County Board of Education, a case in which we represented the North Carolina Advocates for Justice in an amicus brief filed with the Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
State Board of Higher Education v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
State Board of Higher Education v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:45 am
” Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 8:18 am
–MacRae v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is this morning’s United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:08 am
Shibley gets in some law, such as Davis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:03 am
However, the appeals court found that the trial judge had correctly concluded that Dougherty enjoyed personal immunity based on the state of the law prior to Lawrence v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 3:10 pm
Also this afternoon, the Solicitor General recommended the Court deny certiorari in Board of Education of New York v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 10:53 am
The calendar includes some high-profile cases – most notably, Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
The bill comes in response to a recent decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals in DeWolfe v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 5:55 am
Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 5:55 am
Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
