Search for: "State v. C. G. B." Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am by Robert Chesney
For the Convention system, in its recent judgment in Gäfgen v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
., Ltd. lost a trade mark infringement case regarding its ‘Double C’ logo in China.Katfriend Thomas Key reports on the recent decision of the US Supreme Court in Iancu v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 12:24 pm by Lydia Estep
Some of those benefits include (a) not having a committee of unsecured creditors appointed (except for cause, after notice and a hearing) whose attorney’s fees would be paid by the debtor’s estate, (b) 90 days from the petition date for the debtor to file a plan, (c) elimination of the ability of other parties to file a competing plan, (d) a much easier road to confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan with elimination of the absolute priority rule and the Court’s ability… [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:38 am by Romano Beitsma
Even if it were not implicitly disclosed in D1, this feature was considered to be known in the state of the art as exemplified by D3.2.2 The appellant contested the findings of the examining division in the statement of the grounds of appeal. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:28 am by WSLL
CiteID=461971Appeal from the District Court of Johnson County, the Honorable John G. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
These Wands factors include: (A) the breadth of the claims; (B) the nature of the invention; (C) the state of the prior art; (D) the level of one of ordinary skill; (E) the level of predictability in the art; (F) the amount of direction provided by the inventor; (G) the existence of working examples; and (H) the quantity of experimentation needed to make or use the invention based on the content of the disclosure. [read post]