Search for: "State v. Files"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 91,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2009, 6:53 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:26 pm
No charges were filed. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 10:43 am
Criminal Procedure Successive appeals On June 16, 2009, Henry Edward Smith, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:51 am
The purpose of the petition, and those previously filed, was to attempt to overturn guilty pleas entered in 1997 in ... [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:45 pm
Starkey filed a Motion to ... [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm
Fuller v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm
Fuller v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:07 am
States can, however, require offering documents to be filed, and all Regulation A offerings remain subject to state anti-fraud rules. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:10 am
Filing a notice of claim as required by law a condition precedent to maintaining the lawsuitMcKie v LaGuardia Community College/CUNY, 2011 NY Slip Op 04755, Appellate Division, First Department In this employment discrimination action, Supreme Court dismissed Shirley A. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:24 am
On June 3, 2019, the United States Supreme Court released an important decision in the case Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
The Harris v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
The appellant’s brief in the case al-Zahrani et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:28 pm
That is what defense lawyers argue in a motion filed today in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York in the case of US v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
In Moore v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 11:49 am
April 15, 2020) The post Another Terrible Copyright Ruling on IAPs’ Liability for Users’ File-Sharing–Warner v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 9:30 am
Chiropractic v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:16 am
The case is entitled Chavira v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 7:16 am
The Ninth Circuit held yesterday that some state law claims challenging rates for telecommunications services could proceed despite the "filed rate" doctrine. [read post]
