Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 1301 - 1320 of 7,427
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am
The latter part of the presentation covered recent cases on medicines regulation, focussing on R(Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWCA Civ 1311 (although this English Court of Appeal decision was handed down on 21 December 2015, it may have escaped your radar due to seasonal festivities and/or the mad rush to tie up loose ends before the Christmas vacation...) [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 2:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
 Article 3 requires that EU Member States protect the exclusive rights given to copyright holders through national legislation, specifically in relation to communication to the public via wired or wireless means (i.e. the Internet). [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 2:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
 Article 3 requires that EU Member States protect the exclusive rights given to copyright holders through national legislation, specifically in relation to communication to the public via wired or wireless means (i.e. the Internet). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
Late in the March term, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Brunton v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:19 pm by Katie Hoeppner
But TPS holders fought back and won relief from the courts in 2018 in Ramos v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 11:56 am by Wells Bennett
We’re a long ways way off from a trial in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 5:53 pm
Further, the decision threatens to undercut precedent from key FRAND licensing court decisions, such as the CJEU's Huawei v ZTE C-170/13 or the UK's Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
Attorney General Eric Holder announced the civil lawsuit stating in part “[t]he United States has sustained, and will continue to sustain significant costs and damages” and it “seeks in this action the imposition of Clean Water Act civil penalties for each barrel of oil that the defendants discharged into the Gulf of Mexico. [read post]