Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2020, 10:56 am
The notice must state that the copyright holder has a “good faith belief” that the identified content infringes. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:40 am
United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 5:57 am
More than seven years after the same court referred several questions of EU antitrust law relating to SEP injunctions to the bloc's top court in Luxembourg, another referral--and what follows may even be an understatement--looms large: the questions recently raised by the Bundeskartellamt (Federal Cartel of Office of Germany), or at least a largely similar set of questions concerning a SEP holder's duty to grant exhaustive licenses to component makers, will apparently be sent to… [read post]
“No License, No Problem” – Is Qualcomm’s Ninth Circuit Antitrust Victory a Patent Exhaustion Defeat?
1 Sep 2020, 7:35 am
United States, 273 U.S. 236, 241 (1927), “No formal granting of a license is necessary in order to give it effect. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:56 am
While put rights generally are a strong exit mechanism, GMX Technologies v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:13 pm
This is known as a “flip deal,” and according to Smart Oil was contemplated under section 17(c) of the Agreement, which states in bold: “The parties acknowledge that Seller is the holder of a portfolio of gas station businesses, real estate and/or leases and only nominal title holder for purposes of transferring title to the Buyer. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:56 pm
State of NCT of Delhi, reaffirmed its views set out in the case of Sunil Bharti Mittal v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:05 am
Whether this is a workable solution or in line with real-world practice – the UKSC itself stated that "it appears that [such caveats have] not been usual industry practice" – is not thoroughly addressed in the decision. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:57 am
Note that the order in which I just stated the parties is Appellant v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
Norwich orders A Norwich order is a type of pre-trial discovery that allows, among other things, a plaintiff rights-holder to identify wrongdoers who the plaintiff would otherwise be unable to identify. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
Norwich orders A Norwich order is a type of pre-trial discovery that allows, among other things, a plaintiff rights-holder to identify wrongdoers who the plaintiff would otherwise be unable to identify. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:34 am
Regarding the right of publicity, claims that interfere with a copyright holder's exercise of the rights afforded under the Copyright Act are preempted unless the claim serves a serves a distinct state interest. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
Finding it difficult to keep up with an ever-changing world in the midst of a health, environmental, social and political crisis, while keeping up with patent law? [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 1:39 pm
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:43 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 9:42 am
Holder], Section 2 does not bind the federal government,” he said. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am
I don't have much to say about yesterday's Fifth Circuit decision in Defense Distributed v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
It would effectively “go around” encryption by allowing the interdiction of malicious materials in an unencrypted state, even in the absence of predication for law enforcement intervention. [read post]
