Search for: "State v. M. V. L."
Results 1301 - 1320
of 4,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2009, 4:27 am
NEW TRIAL - Also principal instruction improper as one man fled in regards to the plan to get a cab ride without paying, petty theft, when they reached the destination and the other remained in the cab and shot the cab driverWilliams. 34 FLW 685, 4th DCA, PRR no error in imposing PRR sentence for Felony Battery where he was adj. guilty under statute which requires Great Bodily Harm, permanent disability or permanent disfigurement and crime committed could not be committed without the use or threat… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 6:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Stanchi, Linda L. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Descarga el documento: United States of America v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
(citing United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 10:00 am
L. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:30 pm
By Gerald L. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 6:31 am
., LLC v Marcum, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 33865(U) October 29, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 154273/2023 Judge: Joel M. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
By Charles L. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:57 am
Article VII Paragraph 2 of Article V is amended as follows: 1. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:28 am
Case Name: Mickelson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:28 am
Case Name: Mickelson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:49 am
UNITED STATES Tuesday, October 4, 2011 10-1001 MARTINEZ, LUIS M. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:34 am
By K&L Gates Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
