Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 4,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2018, 8:08 pm
In Hunter et al. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:53 am
An environmental scientist of Mexican ancestry who was discharged from a state agency for insubordination, rude behavior, and dishonesty while still in his probationary period made no headway on his claims that the stated reasons for his termination were pretext for discrimination and retaliation (Lobato v State of New Mexico Environment Department, November 5, 2013, Tymkovich, T). [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
In interpreting the concept 'a substantial part, evaluated qualitatively', is the fact that a certain type of data allegedly extracted was obtained by the database maker from a source which is not generally accessible, so that it was possible to procure the data only by extracting them from the databases of that very database maker, to be used as a criterion? [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:12 am
Further, in Pickering v Board of Education, 391 US 563, the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
The state of Texas’ views were invited in Rhine v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:11 am
Hanson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
., v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 10:21 am
A&D Environmental Services, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:22 am
Colorado State Board of Agriculture, 2007 WL 2022061, *18 (D. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court ruled in Board of Trustees of Stanford University v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
In Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 6:48 am
Covington represented Samsung in this case (White, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:15 am
The Supreme Court’s 2013 decisions in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 2:58 pm
Sports Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:41 am
Tate and Lyle Sugars Ltd v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 664 – Read judgment You depend on a subsidy for developing a new technology. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:11 pm
In both UMG v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:11 pm
In both UMG v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 4:24 am
., et al. v. [read post]
