Search for: "State v. Morales" Results 1301 - 1320 of 6,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:03 pm
Justice Kennedy argued that morally, the state's taking of a life is unique in its severity and irreparability. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:39 pm
On February 20, 2008, the Court unanimously affirmed the First Circuit decision in Rowe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Thole v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which come within… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which come within… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:54 am by SHG
 § 704(b), having granted cert in  United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:34 am
Further to global warming (and Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
This goes against every moral fiber of my being. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under New York law, a "qualified privilege" or a "qualified immunity" applies only in situations involving "good faith communications by a party having an interest in a subject, or a moral or societal duty to speak, ... made to [another] party having a corresponding interest. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
It could be based on race, religion, favorite sports team, people have the freedom to be with whom they love.I think this underlying theme is what our legal system will continue to struggle with when it comes to issues involving what is tantamount to enforcing a moral code, as discussed in Lawrence v. [read post]