Search for: "State v. Nations" Results 1301 - 1320 of 42,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2020, 4:26 am by Lucinda Cunningham
In R (Detention Action) v First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) [2015] EWCA Civ 840, the Court of Appeal declared that the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014 (“the 2014 Rules”) (which were materially identical to the 2005 Rules) were ultra vires. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:14 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Federal National Mortgage Association v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 5:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Nolan (Arrest – Reasonable Force)Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
ARTICLE V(1) Where either contracting State imposes the tax by reason of the nationality thereof or the domicile therein of a decedent or a donor or a beneficiary of a decedent's estate or of a gift, such State shallallow against its tax (computed without application of this Article) a credit for the tax imposed by the other contracting State with respect to property situated at the time of the transfer in such other State and included for… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:42 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Department of Justice, a second filed by 26 states challenging the law, and a third filed by small business trade group the National Federation of Independent Business. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:00 am by Daniel Barry
The working group will also hear a presentation comparing the privacy risks of legacy v. non-legacy systems. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:23 pm by Environmental Law Prof
United States, which will hopefully be the court's last word in the fight over access to Salt Creek Canyon in Canyonlands National Park. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:16 am by Anna E. Bullock
The Supreme Court, on June 21, 2021, issued its landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Wayfair that South Dakota can require collection of its sales tax on sales to its residents by out-of-state internet retailers.[2] The 5 to 4 decision overruled two earlier precedents, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am by ISOBELLE WILLIAMS
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]