Search for: "State v. Nelson " Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,086
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2012, 8:48 am by Rob Robinson
Rabiej Leaves The Sedona Conference for Duke Law Center - bit.ly/xOirdg (Brendan McKenna) Keeping Your Outsourced Solution From Becoming A Problem - bit.ly/A61j6J (Joey Seeber, Shaun Yeh) Making The Most Of Delaware’s New eDiscovery Rules: Tips 1-5 - bit.ly/zQXx9T (Daniel Garrie) More Legal Issues about Privacy (and GPS) - bit.ly/xb9Apl (Peter Vogel) NY State Court adopts Zubulake Standard: Reasonable Anticipation of Litigation Triggers… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Rob Robinson
” | Williams Mullen – bit.ly/yVP7EM (Monica McCarroll, Stephen Anthony) Ooops, They Did it Again – Jurors Continue to Improperly Use Internet, and Courts Struggle with Solutions – bit.ly/wmffPX (Gibbons) Pippins Court Affirms Need for Cooperation and Proportionality in eDiscovery – bit.ly/AuGsUO (Philip Favro) Planning is Key in Corporate Fraud Risk Management – bit.ly/x02ZBG (Catherine Dunn) SOPA and PIPA Have Been Shelved | eDiscovery Law Alert –… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:05 pm by Adam Zimmerman
  The facts are based upon a famous ethics case—Zimmerman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 10:28 am by Don Cruse
February 28, 2012 Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of The State of Texas, and Greg Abbott, Attorney General of the State of Texas v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 "A waiver of the attorney-client privilege may be found where the client places the subject matter of the privileged communication in issue or where invasion of the privilege is required to determine the validity of the client's claim or defense and application of the privilege would deprive the adversary of vital information (see Hurrell-Harring v State of New York, 75 AD3d 667, 668; 601 Realty Corp. v Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P.C., 74 AD3d… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:46 am by Bart Torvik
  Given that corporations have no rights under the Fifth Amendment (see U.S. v. [read post]