Search for: "State v. Pass "
Results 1301 - 1320
of 25,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
Whether, if the test from Lemon v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 12:15 pm
’"Doesn't it seem crazy to allow the state to refile the charges after you've served your entire sentence and to potentially now seek to incarcerate you for a longer period as a result of your successful petition under a statute that the Legislature passed to ameliorate the consequences of your prior conviction? [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The case out of California, Marketing Information Masters v. the Board of Trustees of California State University reaches a rather predictable result in dismissing an allegation of copyright infringement on the grounds that states and state institutions are immune from lawsuits by private individuals and corporations. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:53 am
And these arrests came under laws passed by state lawmakers. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:47 pm
See Melton v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:05 am
., v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:00 pm
Manafort cited Justice Scalia's Morrison dissent only in passing. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
In April, 2019, the New York State Legislature passed a concurrent resolution increasing the Governor's and Lieutenant Governor's annual salaries retroactive to January 1, 2019. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
In April, 2019, the New York State Legislature passed a concurrent resolution increasing the Governor's and Lieutenant Governor's annual salaries retroactive to January 1, 2019. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:14 pm
The Court relied on Barnes v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
Data Pass Marketing This case involves a “data pass” marketing program. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 2:54 pm
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, ruling in Dandamudi, et al v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 10:26 am
In Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:09 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 3:13 am
Nor can the irrelevance of section 54 to passing off actions be stated without some rigorous explanation. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:25 am
This is Congress' response to United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:33 am
It also had to ignore its own prior holding, in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
