Search for: "State v. Peters"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 5,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2014, 3:29 pm
In construing a constitution or any part of it, a court should look to the law as it existed at the time it was adopted s held in Matrox v United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Dale Carpenter discusses the amicus brief he filed in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 6:23 am
The case of Estate of Smith v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:57 pm
Case date: 15 March 2019 Case number: No. 2018-129 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
Stockman v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:00 am
It can’t tell courts how to decide cases (again, absent a change in the substantive law on which the case is based), see United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am
Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and Council, implemented in the United Kingdom by the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002, requires member states to take steps to ensure the free movement of information society services between member states. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:33 pm
Among them was a holding that Miller v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:55 am
See, e.g., Peters v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
(Editor’s Note: This essay was written by Robert Monks and Harvard Law School Visiting Professor Peter Murray.) [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:26 am
In Proudfoot Consulting Company, v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm
Quick answer: no” [David Henderson; WSJ/@scottlincicome on seasonal pool-supply company] Hillary Clinton and the Market Basket Stores myth [James Taranto] Labor Department proposes tightening regulation of retirement financial advisers [Kenneth Bentsen, The Hill] Proposed: “well-orchestrated” state ballot initiatives aimed at overturning employment at will [Rand Wilson, Workplace Fairness] My view: “Everybody wins with at-will employment” [Ethan Blevins,… [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:34 pm
A non-consumer company’s standing to bring FDUTPA claims against another company was most prominently recognized in Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 2:19 pm
” Henao v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 am
Peter DeFazio’s announcement that he intends to investigate the potential impeachment of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
The headlines heralding a Seventh Circuit decision in Flava Works v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 7:05 am
” The Federal Circuit also held that the defendants were entitled to sanctions in the form of appellate attorney fees and double costs, against both the complaining individual and his legal counsel (Pirri v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:35 pm
In Bantam Books v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court reaffirmed the state-action doctrine in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:02 am
The Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc in Chism v. [read post]
