Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 1301 - 1320 of 36,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 7:56 am by David Doniger
American Electric Power that states cannot bring suit directly against five of the nation’s largest power companies to curb their emissions as a public nuisance. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 11:56 pm by Tessa Buchanan
The post Case Comment: R (AA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 49 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58:  The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends… [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am by Adam Wagner
However, the court was not challenging the secretary of state’s power to remove a public official from their role, but rather the power to do it summarily and without sufficient consideration. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Only if it was within Congress’ power under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment could disparate impact legislation be applied to the states consistent with the Eleventh Amendment. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Westlaw Bulletin just reported that last month, the Mississippi Supreme Court essentially rejected Chevron at the state level, in King v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 10:49 am
(Defamation; statutory and common-law vexatious litigation; special motion to dismiss pursuant to anti-SLAPP statute (§ 52-196a); absolute immunity under litigation privilege; federal and state right to jury trial; separation of powers doctrine); Vu v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm by WIMS
Otter Tail Power Co., 615 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2010); National Parks and Conservation Association Inc. v. [read post]