Search for: "State v. Register" Results 1301 - 1320 of 13,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 6:44 am
 Is the maintenance of a register of transactions and rights in trade marks for the benefit of (i) the consuming public at large, (ii) prospective assignees, licensees and lenders who want to know who else may have an interest in those rights, (iii) the national tax authorities, (iv) other traders who want certainty as to the nature of their competitors' rights or (v) infringers? [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Cameron Hutchison
Judges have been known to create exceptions not explicitly stated in a statute to avoid absurd results. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE III (1) For the purposes of this Treaty, the territory of a Contracting Party means all the territory under the jurisdiction of that Contracting Party, including airspace and territorial waters, and also includes - (a) any vessel registered in any territory under the jurisdiction of that Contracting Party; and (b) any aircraft registered in any such territory provided that the aircraft is in flight when the relevant offense is committed. (2) For the purposes of this Treaty… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:22 pm by Venkat
GoPets argued that since its mark was distinctive in 2006 when the domain was re-registered, this is sufficient to state a claim under the ACPA. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hillaire v, Montefiore Medical Center, (SD NY, Jan. 16, 2024), a New York federal district court rejected claims of religious discrimination brought by a hospital's Patient Safety Manager who was denied a religious exemption from a state Covid vaccine mandate and subsequently was fired. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Marty Lederman
The constitutional analysis in the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Matal v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:30 pm by Venkat
ConnectU where Judge Seeborg held that access in violation of Facebook terms using log-in information supplied by registered users was sufficient to state a claim under Section 502. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:49 am by Riana Harvey
Further case law has also illustrated that the attractiveness of a design, the intentions of the author, the design’s visual effect, symbolism and commercial success in the marketplace will not be factors in a finding of eligibility for copyright protection (Bleistein v Donaldson Lithographing Co).In relation to derivative works, it is stated that the registration of such works would not cover any previously published or registered works (17 U.S.C. [read post]